Jesus refused the trade both sides are begging you to make
The Third Way Part 04 of 07

Jesus refused the trade both sides are begging you to make

The Left wants you to drop truth to keep love. The Right wants you to drop love to keep truth. Jesus said no to both.

There’s a moment in John 8 that I’ve come back to a hundred times.

A woman is dragged into the temple courts. She’s been caught in adultery. The religious crowd has her surrounded — stones in their hands, righteousness on their lips, ready to execute. They turn to Jesus and basically say: “The law says we should kill her. What do you say?”

It’s a setup. They’re trying to force him to pick a side.

If Jesus says, “Yes, stone her” — he’s no different than the religious bullies. The law-and-order crowd. The truth-without-mercy crowd. They’ve got him.

If Jesus says, “Don’t stone her” — he’s a guy who throws out God’s law because the cultural moment got uncomfortable. The mercy-without-truth crowd. They’ve got him there too.

Either answer puts him on a team.

He refuses both teams.

He bends down. He writes in the dirt. He says one of the most surgical sentences ever spoken: “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone.”

The crowd melts. One by one, they walk away.

Then he turns to the woman — and here’s the part most of us miss — and he doesn’t say “You do you, sis.” He doesn’t say “You’re fine just the way you are.” He says, with absolute clarity, “Go and sin no more.”

He didn’t condemn her. He also didn’t excuse her. He held love and truth together at the same time.

Which is exactly what neither team in our culture wants you to do.

The Left wants you to drop truth to keep love. The Right wants you to drop love to keep truth. Jesus said no to both.

The trade each side is pushing

Here’s the deal you’re being offered, every single day, by every single tribe.

The Left says: “If you really loved people, you wouldn’t tell them they’re wrong. Calling something a sin is unloving. Calling someone to repent is harmful. The only way to love people is to affirm whatever they say about themselves.”

That’s not love. That’s flattery dressed up in therapeutic language. And it leaves people drowning while the lifeguard tells them they’re swimming great.

The Right says: “If you really cared about truth, you wouldn’t be soft on sinners. The way to show people you love them is to tell them how wrong they are, loudly, repeatedly, and on social media. Compassion without confrontation is compromise.”

That’s not truth. That’s cruelty wearing a Bible verse as a hood ornament. And it drives people away from the very Jesus you claim to be representing.

Both deals are scams. Both are easier than what Jesus actually did. Both are offered to you constantly. And both will gut your witness if you take them.

What Jesus actually did

The apostle John, writing about Jesus decades later, used a phrase that ought to be tattooed on the inside of every Christian’s eyelids:

“…full of grace and truth.” (John 1:14)

Not grace OR truth. Not grace SOMETIMES and truth OTHER TIMES. Both, at full strength, all the time.

Watch Jesus through the Gospels. He sits at Zacchaeus’s table — full of grace — and Zacchaeus walks out a transformed man because he encountered truth at that table. He talks to the woman at the well — full of grace — and gently names her five husbands and current partner, full of truth. He defends the woman caught in adultery — full of grace — and tells her to leave her life of sin, full of truth.

Every single encounter Jesus had carried both. Nobody walked away from Jesus feeling unloved. Nobody walked away from Jesus feeling unchallenged.

That is the picture of Christian maturity. That is the picture our culture is desperate to see and almost never does.

Nobody walked away from Jesus feeling unloved. Nobody walked away from Jesus feeling unchallenged.

The two failure modes in real life

Want to know if you’ve fallen into one of the two ditches? Here’s the test.

The Left’s failure mode: You can’t actually name any sin specifically. You can talk all day about systems and structures and harm and oppression — and some of that talk is genuinely important — but if you were sitting across a table from a real person who was destroying their life and the lives of people around them, you wouldn’t be able to gently, lovingly, clearly tell them to stop. The word “sin” feels too sharp in your mouth. You’ve traded prophetic clarity for therapeutic vagueness.

The Right’s failure mode: You can name sin all day long, but only in other people. The LGBT community. The immigrants. The unbeliever. The progressive. The pronoun crowd. You’re a specialist in their sins and a passing acquaintance with your own. You have no idea how to sit with a hurting person without first making sure they know how wrong they are. You’ve traded compassion for combat.

If either of those described you uncomfortably well — that’s the Spirit doing his job. Stay with the discomfort.

The test case

Let me make this brutally practical with one example. Let’s take the most divisive cultural fault line in the American church: sexuality.

The Left’s failure: We celebrate every identity, affirm every choice, and never speak a word that might suggest a person’s sexual or relational life isn’t bringing them flourishing. We’ve been so afraid of being unkind that we’ve stopped being honest. People we love walk into ditches we could see coming and we say nothing because saying anything got too costly.

The Right’s failure: We’ve made certain sexual sins into the defining sins. We’ve been so loud about what’s wrong that no LGBT person trusts us to actually love them. We’ve turned a topic Jesus barely mentioned into the center of our public witness. The result is a generation of gay kids who would rather take their lives than walk into our churches.

Both sides have part of the truth. Neither has Jesus.

Jesus would absolutely sit at the table with anyone — full of grace. And Jesus would absolutely be honest with anyone about how God designed them to live — full of truth. And he would do both at the same time, because anything less than both is less than love.

A question to sit with

This week, ask yourself:

In my last hard conversation, did I sound more like the Left’s failure mode or the Right’s failure mode? Did I withhold truth to keep the peace? Or did I withhold compassion to make a point?

Both are failures. Both fall short of Jesus. The way forward is harder than picking either one.

Next week: Slow to Speak, Quick to Listen — and why every hot take you’ve been tempted to fire off this month is making you less like Jesus, not more.


Tell me in the comments where this hits. Have you been pushed toward one of those two trades? Which one? What helped you find the middle ground — or are you still looking?

Share this with someone you’ve had a hard conversation with recently.

#politics#love#truth

The Third Way

  1. 01 Jesus would get canceled by both sides
  2. 02 If you're just against what "they" are for, you're not rooted. You're reacting.
  3. 03 Jesus saved his sharpest words for his own side
  4. 04 Jesus refused the trade both sides are begging you to make you are here
  5. 05 Your hot take is making you less like Jesus
  6. 06 Both sides worship the same idol — and Jesus rejected it on purpose
  7. 07 Stop acting like the world is ending. The resurrection already happened.